Showing posts with label One star. Show all posts
Showing posts with label One star. Show all posts

Sunday, June 19, 2011

The eBook on eBooks by Aaron Patterson

Nutshell:  Kindle bestselling author Aaron Patterson cashes in on his success with this crappy little waste of three bucks.  One star.

Review:  This exceedingly slim volume contains absolutely nothing you can't glean from any succesful indie writer's blog.  Konrath's, for example.  If you're serious about indie publishing, then you've already learned everything in this ridiculous excuse for a book.  Patterson had the opportunity to really write an interesting--perhaps even inspiring--story, but instead whipped this paper-thin thing off in an afternoon, apparently.  A couple of things stick out:  do you really need a book that defines an e-book for you (meaning literally points out that an e-book is an electronic book, not a book in print) not once, but twice?!  If you haven't figured that out, then you probably are going to have a pretty short career as an indie author.  Second, despite the exhortation to get your books professionally converted so that they look good, you would think that Patterson's own book would have page breaks in the proper places and wouldn't have the odd "Table of Contents" fragment at the end.  Or is it just me who would think that?

Rating:  One star.  Seems like a cynical way to make money off the hopes of indie authors, and really a waste of money.  It would be a waste of time too, but it only took ten minutes to read, so I can't complain about that too much.

Monday, May 9, 2011

Saving Rachel by John Locke

Nutshell:  A computer whiz who specializes in hiding other people's money finds himself targeted and two women--his mistress and his wife--are used as leverage to get him to cough up the codes the bad guys need to access billions of dollars.  This is a really crappy book.  One star.

Review:  I do admire John Locke.  He has repeatedly said that his aim was to dominate the 99-cent ebook market, and he appears to have hit his goal repeatedly.  As he has proclaimed in various places, every seven seconds of every day, a John Locke book is bought.  However, if his other books are of the same caliber as Saving Rachel, then I'm stumped as to how that happened since he appears to have nearly no ability as a writer.

The entire book seems to have been written in shorthand:  instead of characterization, we get brand names thrown around.  Exposition is provided in long stretches of dialogue, as if Locke were too lazy to develop a story and instead just had the characters explain how reasonable the book's multiple implausibilities really are.  We're somehow supposed to care about the main character, who is having an affair with a beautiful blonde (as he claims, "I just banged Karen Vogel") yet somehow also really loves his wife Rachel.  Or maybe we're not supposed to care, in which case Locke succeeded. 

I would never denigrate anybody for getting people to read, and I still admire Locke for that.  It's just too bad that he's not a better writer.  If you're tired of the intellectual effort required by Mack Bolan books, then this is for you.  Otherwise, go to Taco Bell and spend your 99 cents on a bean burrito.  The guy who squirts refried beans into a tortilla, sprinkles cheese on it and wraps it up will display greater craftsmanship than Locke does here, and trust me, you'll feel better after the burrito.

Rating:  A solid one star.  This is not a book for serious readers.